Dehumanization is a key theme
throughout Fredrick Douglass’ life. What makes his story different is how he
was able to reconstruct himself back into a functioning society. How does this
happen? In “Narative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass” by Fredrick Douglass he
goes into depth about feelings and emotions he felt as both a slave and a “free”
man. I do not believe that I could possibly go from being treated like filth to
equal, in a sense, in a place with the people who formally oppressed me. It
takes such patience and such will to not treat those who controlled, beat, and
tortured you the same way once you have the opportunity. Fredrick’s story is
one of the truly most amazing ones ever because he over cam adversity and
suicidal thoughts and truly morphed from slave to a man. Once he was introduced
to living in a society, he was still viewed as a black man. The white owners who treated him lower
than an animal went from oppressors to peers. Douglass spoke to his true
feelings when he wrote, “The truth was, I felt myself a slave, and the idea of
speaking to white people weighed me down” (98 Douglass). Further illustrating
that his peers were still in power. He had to abide by the laws of living in a
city where money was the way to living comfortably. He still had to gain employment
and work grueling hours while still receiving less pay.
The Nazi’s played a similar role to
the slave owners in World War II. A leader told them that the Jewish culture
was ruining everyday life and that the Jews were to blame for all the hardships
that have fallen upon the German people. In turn the Jews were treated like
dirt, corralled and went from normal people in society to the ultimate enemy.
There were various stages before the Jews ended up in the internment camps.
There were made to wear Hebrew Star patches, live in the low income ghettos,
and ultimately purged from the streets by German authority. Once in the
interment camps, they were malnourished to the point of emaciation and treated
like a common street rat. This was the ultimate dehumanization. Left in the
cold to starve, freeze, and basically rot because one leader has turned you
into an enemy. They were taken down to the level that Douglass described but
were left stagnant sitting in these camps left to ultimately die. These people
had survivors and like Fredrick had gone through the transformation from a man
made a prisoner to a prisoner made a man. Once reintroduced back into the
normal population, they still maintained the feeling of being less than the
average citizen.
The hardest thing I feel that these
two very different examples pose is their reintegration back into society.
Going from these awful situations back to functioning day to day, as a free
person must be so different. Living once again free with the people that dehumanized
and degraded you as a person, who treated you like garbage because you were
just another person that society deemed unsuitable to live free. These people
will to move back into society while still being viewed as a lower class than
people of their same stature. Will their opportunity allow them to achieve as
much as the oppressors that held them back for so many years? It depends on
what they opt to do and how they live their lives.
What causes these changes in
society? How can people treat others like this? I believe in the case of
slaves, that it was so engrained in society people did not believe that they
were wrong. They were brought up
having slaves and figured why not own them myself. But with the oppression of
the Jewish people there is no answer for that. They previously had a place in
society right next to the German’s who now would not stand to let them live. It
goes to show what society will do in times of serious trouble. They will look
to one leader, such as Hitler, and follow his every whim to get them out of the
place and time of hardship. Someone with authority and power over the people
with a negative connotation is never a positive thing. These feelings did not
leave that generation and people are still feeling the effects today. Discrimination
is one of the biggest problems in modern society that is run by wealth and
affluence. In Douglass’ case, he never received the opportunities that we are
given in the present day, but those opportunities are in themselves not free.
How does one truly feel free in a society that projects freedom but in a
structured manor? I can not go and do whatever I want because there are laws
that restrict me. So am I free? Well I am free to make my own choices but those
choices must follow the laws of society.
I definitely agree with the argument, or question regarding how free citizens in our country truly are. There are plenty of aspects in our society that affect the alleged freedoms we possess. Yes the constitution establishes a long set of laws and freedoms that allow us to speak, write, and support our own ideals freely. However, I feel the foundation of our country faces far more conflicts than individuality and race. Financial, educational, and societal statuses all conflict the freedoms that we pretend to have control over on a daily basis.
ReplyDeleteI do see how the power of slave owners and Nazi’s relate in that they greatly discriminated and dehumanized plenty of people. However, I feel it conflicts with your argument of how “Discrimination is one of the biggest problems in modern society that is run by wealth and affluence”. Much of this piece’s argument revolves around coming back to a society after being dehumanized in some form of institution. If the argument included more of the wealth and educational affluences on an individual it would make it a lot stronger. Dehumanization appears as a very broad subject in that there is really one conclusion; someone is degraded from being a human being. Considering the class structures in comparison to modern society and those in the past would help a little as well. There are essentially only three class groups, but the way each are affected through financial and educational “wealth” are different.
The claim, “Once reintroduced back into the normal population, they still maintained the feeling of being less than the average citizen,” is difficult to understand because the concept of the average citizen is so broad. The average person could be anyone in range from slave holders, slaves, powerful business men, to factory workers in the lower financial class; American society is too dynamic to classify it as one thing. This argument would be stronger when trying to prove a concept like freedom after being enslaved is morally and intuitively impossible. It’s as though recovering from cultural aspects like Douglass and Jewish prisoners is far too difficult to overcome? I do agree with this standpoint of integration into a non-enslaved society; I think it just needs more concrete examples of how Douglass suffered integration and Jewish integration, if possible.